Prediction of Sumit Nagal [171st] vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong [175th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LH2H: Nagal 1 - 1 Wong
They have played 5 sets in total, with Nagal winning 3 and Wong winning 2. The last match between Nagal and Wong was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2024, Q3, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 3-6 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sumit Nagal | 1 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 23 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:58:30 | Average Match Time | 1:58:30 |
| 70% (129/183) | 1st Serve % | 63% (102/163) |
| 68% (88/129) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (75/102) |
| 48% (26/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (22/61) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 21% (4/19) |
| 40% (66/163) | Return Points Win % | 38% (69/183) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sumit Nagal vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 1 Wong
Editorial Prediction:
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Federico Iannaccone
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ergi Kirkin
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Amine Jamji
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
84%
(
27 of
32)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sumit Nagal
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (339/233) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/109) |
| 58% (773/561) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/267) |
| 53% (6537/5748) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2848/2721) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 782 | Aces Total | 1313 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1233 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:32:47 | Average Match Time | 1:30:18 |
| 228.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.91 |
| 68% (23791/35192) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9161/15252) |
| 64% (15298/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6480/9161) |
| 50% (5746/11387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2947/6091) |
| 44% (1844/4176) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1447) |
| 43% (15480/36169) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5962/15383) |
| 60% (330/549) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/243) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 58% (84/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (45/81) |
| 49% (87/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 84% (354/299) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 15% (354/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 18% (218/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (119/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
